Jim Cramer delivers a blunt tax message for retirees

Jim Cramer has never been hesitant to weigh in on taxes, and he underscored that point again on a recent episode of Mad Money. When asked whether investors should lock in a gain now or wait for long-term capital gains treatment, he replied: “Never fear the tax man, fear the losses.”

The remark lands in the middle of an important debate. One recent Kiplinger analysis warned that investors who hold appreciated stock mainly to avoid taxes can end up taking a much bigger hit if the position drops. For retirees, who have less time to bounce back from a loss, the issue matters even more.

Why the one-year threshold matters

How long an asset is held determines how the gain is taxed. Once the holding period passes one year, the profit is considered long-term. Before that point, it is taxed as ordinary income. Even one day can make a meaningful difference in the final tax bill.

At the high end, ordinary income rates climb quickly. For 2026, the 37% bracket begins at $640,600 for single filers and $768,700 for married couples filing jointly, according to the IRS. For retirees, adding a short-term gain to retirement income can push taxable income further into that bracket than expected.

Long-term gains are taxed more favorably, at 0%, 15% or 20% depending on income. The 0% rate applies to taxable income up to $49,450 for single filers and $98,900 for married couples filing jointly in 2026. That means some retirees can sell a winning investment and still owe nothing in federal capital gains tax.

Losses can help, but only to a limited degree. “Losses are very valuable,” said Jeffrey Levine, chief planning officer at Focus Wealth Partners. Capital losses first offset capital gains, and up to $3,000 of any remaining loss can be used against ordinary income each year, with the rest carried forward. In short, the tax code softens the blow somewhat, but most of the decline still comes out of the investor’s pocket.

When selling can be the better move

Cramer’s view is consistent with remarks he has made before. On an earlier episode, he told a 66-year-old dividend investor that “in my first book I wrote do not fear the tax man,” and in another segment he warned that selling winners to buy losers can create “a self-fulfilling spiral as the bad stocks stay bad,” according to 24/7 Wall St.

This is not a new argument. In a 2015 column, Cramer said investors should not keep a stock with an uncertain future simply to avoid paying a higher short-term capital gains rate, CNBC reported. That logic still holds.

Retirees are especially vulnerable when a portfolio is too concentrated. Vanguard’s S&P 500 ETF, for example, already has about 35% of its weight in technology, showing that even a broad index fund is not as diversified as it may appear. A single stock at the center of a retirement portfolio carries far more risk, and there is less time left to recover from a steep decline.

The company’s fundamentals should also guide the decision. When a stock falls, Cramer says investors should ask whether the business itself is weakening or whether outside forces are to blame, because “the first deserves caution,” according to TheStreet. If the original investment thesis no longer makes sense, waiting for a lower tax rate can expose real money to risk in exchange for a relatively small tax benefit.

When holding on still makes sense

Inheritance changes the calculation. Under federal law, property passed at death generally receives a new basis equal to “the fair market value of the property at the date of the decedent’s death.” That step-up erases the gains that accumulated during the original owner’s lifetime.

Heirs also avoid the usual holding-period rule. Someone who inherits property and sells it within a year is still “considered to have held such property for more than 1 year,” according to the IRS. As a result, any gain after the date of death is taxed at long-term rates.

For an older investor with a decades-long, low-cost position in a durable company, keeping the shares can therefore be the better choice. Selling converts a gain that might disappear at death into a taxable event, which is an important exception to Cramer’s rule for retirees planning to leave stock to family members.

Patience can also pay off when a position is close to crossing the one-year mark and the underlying business remains sound. In that case, waiting for long-term treatment may be reasonable, and Cramer has acknowledged that “there’s often two rights that compete against each other.”

The bottom line for retirees

For most retirees, Cramer’s message still holds: a major decline is usually more costly than the tax bill, especially when the 0% and 15% brackets keep the price of selling relatively low. He has also long argued that it is “better to pay a bigger tax bill on a terrific gain than a smaller tax bill on a tiny gain,” according to CNBC.

The main exception involves stock intended for heirs, particularly when pensions, Social Security or other savings are enough to cover living costs. As one adviser put it, the objective is not to erase taxes entirely. It is to stop taxes from driving the whole investment strategy.

Two figures should guide the decision: expected taxable income for the year and the date a holding will pass the one-year threshold. Cramer has urged viewers to review those details with a tax professional, and that remains sensible advice for any retiree considering a large sale.

The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.