Skip to content

Medicare and Senior Benefits

Should You Claim Social Security at 62 or 70? The Break-Even Point Is Around 80

Digilifetrends Published 3 min read

Choosing when to start Social Security can feel like a gamble until you compare it with how long you actually live. One filing age can outperform the others depending on lifespan, and the difference at the extremes can be substantial.

Seniors deciding when to claim Social Security face a major trade-off. Starting at 62 locks in a permanently smaller monthly check, while waiting until 70 boosts the benefit for life.

Detail of several Social Security Cards and cash money symbolizing retirement pensions financial safety
© Lane V. Erickson / Shutterstock.com

If you live to about 80, the total benefits from claiming early or waiting may end up being roughly the same. But if you live much shorter or much longer than that, the outcome can change dramatically.

Why the break-even age matters

Before deciding whether to file early, at full retirement age, or later, it helps to figure out your break-even age. That is the point at which the lifetime value of claiming early and claiming later becomes about equal.

If your choice is between age 62 and age 70, the break-even point is around age 80. For instance, if your full retirement age is 67 and your monthly benefit would be $2,000, filing at either 62 or 80 would leave you with about $300,000 in total benefits by age 80.

In that example, claiming at full retirement age produces the best result overall. Filing at 67 would give you about $10,000 more than claiming at either 62 or 70.

That is why it is important to calculate your break-even age and then weigh your health and family history. If your health is poor, or if your parents died young, that may point you toward claiming earlier. If you are in strong health and your parents lived into their 90s, waiting longer may make more sense.

Why lifespan changes the answer

In the example above, claiming at 62 or 70 leads to roughly $300,000 in lifetime benefits. But the result shifts sharply if you only live to 74.

In that case, filing at 62 is the strongest option by a wide margin. You would collect about $201,000 over your lifetime, compared with $168,000 at full retirement age and $119,000 if you waited until 70.

Now consider a much longer lifespan, with death not occurring until age 95. Under that scenario, claiming at 70 becomes the clear winner.

An age-70 claim would total about $744,000 in Social Security benefits. By comparison, claiming at full retirement age would bring in about $672,000, while filing at 62 would produce about $554,000.

Of course, no one can know exactly how long they will live. Even excellent health and a strong family history do not guarantee a long life.

Still, the break-even age is a useful place to start. From there, you can factor in your health, your family history, how urgently you need income now, and how much retirement savings you have to decide when to file.

There is no single right answer. Social Security is built so that, for someone with an average lifespan, the lifetime payout is roughly similar no matter when the claim begins. That is worth remembering if you are struggling to choose.

More from Digilifetrends