AARP Issues a Stark Alert to Workers Depending on Social Security

When retirement is on the horizon, many people imagine the day the mortgage is gone or the moment they no longer have to wake up for work. For a lot of Americans, Social Security is a central part of making that future possible.

AARP says a proposal to raise the full retirement age from 67 to 70 could make retirement significantly less affordable. No policy has changed yet, but the group warns that the impact could be substantial, especially for workers planning to leave the workforce soon.

Why AARP is pushing back on age 70

AARP is firmly against increasing Social Security's full retirement age to 70. The organization argues that workers have already paid into the system throughout their careers and should not be forced to wait longer to receive full benefits.

The group points to the 1983 Social Security changes, which gradually lifted the full retirement age from 65 to 67. AARP notes that those reforms, combined with other adjustments, effectively cut benefits by an estimated 19%.

Bill Sweeney of AARP says another increase would again ask future retirees to absorb smaller monthly checks in the name of improving the program's finances.

How a higher full retirement age could shrink benefits

Under current rules, the full retirement age is 67 for people born in 1960 or later, though workers can begin claiming Social Security as early as 62. Filing five years early reduces monthly benefits by 30%, so someone due $2,000 at 67 would receive about $1,400 at 62.

If the full retirement age rose to 70 while the earliest claiming age stayed at 62, a person would be claiming eight years early instead of five. Using Social Security's current reduction formula, that benefit would drop by roughly 45%, or about $1,100 a month.

Compared with today's rules, that is a cut of $300 a month, or $3,600 a year, and about 21% less overall. Future cost-of-living increases would also be based on the smaller amount, so the difference would continue throughout retirement.

Why waiting until 70 would not erase the loss

Delaying benefits until 70 might sound like a way to avoid cuts, but it would still leave retirees with less than they would get under the current system. Today, waiting until 70 boosts the monthly payment; under a higher full retirement age, people would simply have to wait that long to receive their full benefit.

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities estimates that moving the age from 67 to 70 would trim monthly benefits by nearly 20% at any claiming age.

People could still file at 62, but the larger reduction would be especially hard on those who cannot keep working because of health problems or job loss.

Younger workers would likely feel the biggest impact

If lawmakers raised the full retirement age, younger workers would likely bear most of the change. The increase would probably be phased in gradually, which would shield people closer to retirement while shifting more of the burden to younger Americans.

The Congressional Budget Office has analyzed one approach that would slowly raise the full retirement age to 70 for anyone born in 1981 or later. In that scenario, workers claiming Social Security at 65 would receive:

• People born in the 1960s: about 3% less.
• People born in the 1970s: about 13% less.
• People born in the 1980s: about 19% less.

Someone in their early 60s might see only a modest change under this plan, while a worker in their 40s could eventually face the full increase to 70.

Younger workers would have more time to adjust their plans, but they would also need to prepare for the possibility of a smaller Social Security check than they currently expect.

Why working longer is not realistic for everyone

Not everyone is able to retire on their own schedule. Health issues or sudden layoffs can end a career years earlier than expected, leaving some people with little choice but to claim benefits sooner.

According to the Social Security Administration, about 62% of people who began collecting retirement benefits in 2025 claimed early. In a survey conducted the following year, 41% of those who retired earlier than planned said health problems or a disability were the reason.

For many households, delaying benefits may simply not be possible if savings are limited. If half of retirement income comes from Social Security, a 20% cut in benefits would translate into about a 10% drop in total income. For people living entirely on Social Security, the full reduction would hit directly.

How to prepare for possible changes

A good starting point is to review your estimated benefit under current rules through your my Social Security account at SSA.gov. From there, it helps to test how your budget would hold up with a smaller check.

If you expect to receive $2,000 a month, for example, see whether your expenses could still be covered with $1,600. Building extra savings can also give you more flexibility if you have to stop working earlier than planned.

With the Social Security retirement trust fund projected to run short of reserves in 2032, changes to the program remain possible. For now, the safest move may be to keep your options open rather than making major decisions based on proposals that are not yet law.

The bottom line

You may already have a retirement date in mind, and there is no need to erase it yet. Raising the full retirement age to 70 is not law, but AARP says the warning is a reminder that the Social Security benefit you expect could look different by the time you retire.

While you still have time, think about how you would manage with a smaller payment and look for ways to cut costs in retirement. Saving a little more now could give you more freedom to leave work when you are ready, no matter what Congress ultimately decides.

AARP Benefits

• Big discounts on travel, groceries, prescriptions and more
• Access to financial planning resources and health tools
• Join AARP and get 25% off with automatic renewal